The 10% Lie (Audio)Submitted by EarlHall on Mon, 05/05/2008 - 14:52 |
I have been dealing with preachers and people over the
past few days on my book and my stance on tithing. It seems like people
(church leaders) are mad at me because I am trying to free people from
"giving lies". Listen to this show and see what I mean.
Subscribe via rss feed |
Subscribe via iTunes |
If this episode has been a blessing to you, please consider supporting us financially. We thank you for your support
I want to personally thank you for supporting my ministry. Your contribution will help me to continue to spread the Word of God.
--
Earl B. Hall, II - Unlearned
- EarlHall's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Malachi 3:6-12
Pastor Hall,
I want to make things a bit interesting here, so bare with me. I haven't had a chance to get and read your new ebook, but I do plan on doing so, so I don't know if you have covered this in your book. The bible tells us in Malachi 3:6-12, which a lot of preachers use for thithing, but it says "I am the Lord, and i do not change. That is why you descendants of Jacob are not already destroyed. Ever since the days of your ancestors, you have scorned my decrees and failed to obey them. Now return to me, and I will return to you, says the Lord of Heaven's Armies. But you ask, How can we return when we have never gone away? Should people cheat God? Yet you have cheated me! But you ask, What do you mean? When did we ever cheat you? You have cheated me of the tithes and offerings due me. You are under a curse, for your whole nation has been cheating me. Bring all the tithes into the storehouse so there will be enough food in my Temple. If you do, says the Lord of Heaven's Armies, I will open the windows of heaven for you. I will pour out a blessing so great you won't have enough room to take it in! Try it! Put me to the test! Your crops will be abundanct, for I will guard themfrom insects and disease. Your grapes willl not fall from the vine before they are ripe, says the Lord of Heaven's Armies. Then all nations will call you blessed, for your land will be such a delight, says the Lord of Heaven's Armies."
But what I wanted to point out was the first verse "I am the Lord, and I do not change." then a few verses down he talks about the tithes and offerings. Like I said I have heard preacher use this, so I am wondering your point of view. Thanks. God Bless
Shalom,
Daniel Candelaria Jr.
www.DC-Ministries.org
Toll Free:1-866-214-2504 ext.111
Cell: 915-799-1631
Daniel@DC-Ministries.org
Broadcast on Holy Revival Radio:
The Body of Christ Broadcast
Teaching God’s word for a life change
Teaching Relationship not religion
In His Service,
Daniel
Answer
Daniel,
with that scripture in Malachi, you are looking before Jesus came. God did say I change not and you have to understand that he would never have changed ANYTHING if Jesus did not come. There are 2 different dispensations here. Old law and Grace. If the words spoken in Malachi were meant to be forever, then there was no need for Christ. You see that God did change because of Jesus. In Hebrews 7 it even says, "because there has been a CHANGE of the priesthood, there is need also to CHANGE the law". The reason that God did change is because we are no longer under law, but rather under grace.
Preachers do try and us that scripture to prove me wrong, but again, if tithing is still a requirement, then so is stoning people for commiting sin. I hope this answers your question.
Pastor Earl B. Hall, II
--
Pastor Earl B. Hall, II - Unlearned
888 633 0005
Live call in show ever M-W-F at 11am CST "On Air with Earl Hall" on www.holyrevivalradio.com
Address to the answer
After viewing and/or listening to much of the information on this site, I can agree with much of it until I reach this, what you call "The 10% lie".
Let me begin by saying that in my possition as a pastor, I am not the type to either bludgeon, or hold be in bondage to the tithe. I teach, and allow the Spirit to direct people to act accordingly. I do understand some people's aversion to paying the tithe due to being nearly beaten to death over it with constant recitations of Mal 3:8-10, as was done in the church where I first entered the ministry. But I am also one who strictly shuns creating a tradition or doctrine for the church based on a few lines of scripture from any particular chapter. But I fear this is exactly what you've done in your adress to tithing. Allow me to explain.
First, in your rebuttal to tithing, you merely cite one particular portion of the passage in Heb 7 (Heb 7:12). But this, you suggest that God did change, though you also cite God specifically states that he does not change (Mal 3:6). If God does change according to your interpretation of Heb 7:12, than this is in distinct contradiction to Mal 3:6. This being the case, you must then come to the conclusion that one or the other is either incorrect, or a lie. Since suggesting that God lies is in direct conflict with Num 23:19, for the sake of this commentary, we'll say that God told the truth in Mal 3:6. Thus, we must say that either Heb 7:12 is totally incorrect, or has been incorrectly interpreted. I'll lean toward the latter, based solely upon the verses which preceed verse 12 in Hebrews 7.
Verses 1-7 in the chapter describe how Melchisedec recieved the tenth from Abraham, though he was not a Levitical priest as was commanded under the Mosaic Law, that only Levite priest were to handle such matters. But in verse 8, it is clearly stated that men who die recieved tithe (Levitical priest), but of "whom it is witnessed that he liveth" also receives them. Verse 11 states that there is a priest that rises up after the order of Melchisedec, rather than the order of Aaron. Verse 12 does not suggest that the change of the law did away with the tithe, because the statements in verse 13-14, state that the reason is due to the priest mentioned in verse 11, comming from the tribe of Judah, rather than the tribe of Levi. Verses 15-17 state that this priest is after both the similitude and order of Melchisedec, and that this priesthood is forever. The "disannuling" of the law referenced in verse 18, is also not a doing away of with the tithe, but a discontinuance of the necessity of paying of the tithe to only members of a specific "priestly" tribe (Levites). The tithe is thus payed as an outward act of faith to God, through Jesus. This is based on direct transliteration of the text as it stands, rather than any interpretation of my own.
Bear in mind, that I mean no offense. But I am led to assume (something I rarely do) that you're take is likely based on a phenomenon that I have observed in the church. That is, pastors who are living "high on the hog" due to congregants paying their tithes. Rest assured that I am not such a pastor. If I were, I wouldn't have to work the all to occasional 48 hr shift at the small business I own. Hence, I am totally against any pastor using the tithe for his/her personal life of luxury. Any tithe received in the church I pastor, goes strictly to operating cost of the sanctuary, funding outreach programs, establishing scholarships for your youth, feeding and clothing the widows and the homeless, and various other community ministry programs. However, once again; I am not the kind to demand that people pay a tithe. I maintain that once I teach, I let it rest upon the people to act accordingly. After all, none of us can force anyone to obey God.
Be blessed.
Tithing
"E COMING IN HONDAAAA" Just kidding. Sorry to jump in but I just couldn't help my self. Here's a few things for the brother to consider carefully. Also I might add one of the main reasons I believe it's hard for Pastor's such as yourself to accept the no tithe. It can be very difficult to accept the idea of depending on the people to give without being push by guilt, coercion or force. Especially when many have gone beyond the means of oversized edifices, programs and luxuries. One significant thing that should cause one to think upon is throughout the New Testament. There is no example of tithing after the establishment of the church. Nor is there any major emphasis by instruction, illustration or observation of tithing. I'm quite Paul would have atleast had to make some distinction or letter of correction concerning tithing. He sure made a point to thoroughly correct the Corinthians concerning tongues. However for some odd reasons the church still hasn't got that yet. Another story pardon me. Foolish of me to expect better from "Pastors" today, however I still hope. The use of Abraham tithing to Melchizedek is a very weak attempt to justify one's excuse to tithe or recieve tithes. Abraham tithe before the law of the tithe. Abraham DID NOT tithe of his PERSONAL possessions. It was plunder, spoils or booty of war. Here a few points I found years ago that helped me.
Abraham never tithed on his own personal property or livestock.
Jacob wouldn’t tithe until God blessed him first.
Only Levite priests could collect tithes, and there are no Levite priests today.
Only food products from the land were tithable.
Money was never a tithable commodity.
Christian converts were never asked to tithe anything to the Church.
Tithing in the Church first appears centuries after completion of the Bible.
Let me add also tithing undermines spirit led giving
Check out site bible-truths.com, No more tithing and various others that go Genesis to Hebrews covering the whole subject.
"Will a man rob God(or His people)" YES HE WILL.........
Neil
In rebutal to Mr. Neil
It appears that you don't read very well on what we "pastors" write. Evidently, you completely missed my repeated statement wherein I do not make a demand that anyone tithes. You must have also missed the fact that my wife and I, as leaders in the church; are always the first tithers, thereby setting an example that we are not teaching anything that we do not believe in practicing.
You've also missed very many key points in bibilcal text. You say that:
Abraham never tithed on his own personal property or livestock.
If this is the case, then Gen 14:19-20; Heb 7:2 must be lying when they both state that Abraham gave tithes of all. Furthermore, the spoils of war become the victor's personal possessions by mandate of the law regarding warfare. But then maybe you're nto a student of the laws of ancient warfare.
You state:
Jacob wouldn’t tithe until God blessed him first.
One particular "prophets" disobedience isn't spectacular in context to the law of tithing when we observe that disobdience can be found in every prophet in scripture accept Jesus himself. Using one prophet's disobedience to justify your possition, is like justifying jumping off of a bridge because someone else did it before you. Thus, you wage a "straw man" argument with this one.
You say:
Only Levite priests could collect tithes, and there are no Levite priests today.
I again submit Heb 7:11-17 for your reading. I've already expounded upon this in the previous response.
You say:
Only food products from the land were tithable.
You are entirely incorrect. Cattle, precious metals, and artifacts were also tithed (again see Abraham). Also, during the time of the Law, the barter system was the common means of trade rather than monetary exchange. Now how many people in the Western world today are actually using the barter system? Again, "Straw Man" argument.
You say:
Money was never a tithable commodity.
See above.
You say:
Christian converts were never asked to tithe anything to the Church.
Once again, you are dead wrong and have neglected a thorough study of scripture.
In Acts 5:1-11 Ananias and Sapphira fall dead after giving only part of the price of the land which they had sold to the apostles Paul and Peter. There's your glaring example of Christian converts.
You say:
Tithing in the Church first appears centuries after completion of the Bible.
Entirely incorrect again. Church history clearly shows that tithing occured in the 1st century church. Also, see Acts 5 above, and study those 13 epistles in depth.
You say:
Let me add also tithing undermines spirit led giving
Totally incorrect again. If one is truly "spirit led" to give, then one would give in strict obedience to God, His word, and His perfect will. This because, the first evidence of one being "spirit led" is that he/she obeys God. Improper teaching on this has led to individuals with 6 figure salaries believing that a $3 bucket plunk ($1 for the Father, 1 for the Son, 1 for the Holy Ghost), is an acceptable, "spirit led" offering.
It is very intersting that you cite a web site as your source of information when that same web site has information posted by several apostates contending that the Bible is full of error an contradiction. And I, for one; am a stauch proponent of Christians doing their homework before citing web information as being "biblical truth". In addition, this is not about what we pastors can't imagine, but what congregants like yourself can't seem to fathom. That is, we live in a real world wherein nothing is coming to us for free. Yet you want to sit in a sanctuary with lights so you can see to read your bible, heat so that you are warm in the winter, a/c to cool you in the hot summer months, and a roof over your head to keep you dry when it rains. But I suppose you expect the pastors to go into bankruptcy keeping all of this up, maintained, and running for your benefit. The tithe is earmarked for the work of the ministry and not for the pockets of the pastors. Now I've previously mentioned those who misappropriate the tithe for their personal gain, and I take a direct stance against such. This is why within the ministry I oversee, no one individual is responsible for counting and overseeing the distrubution of tithe funds which are collected. This is a means by which accountability is kept. A detailed record is kept of what comes in, and what goes out. And this is completely about integrity and not a 501c3 (we don't have one). I've also previously mentioned that I draw an income from the business which I both own and operate. So I assume that you also have a distinct problem fathoming a pastor who also works and average 90 hours per week, and thus, has no need of living off any tithe or offering the members of his church gives. But in the future, have your facts, rather than making a rant because you don't wish to pay the tithe. If you don't, I don't really care as it holds no bearing on my life, blessings, salvation, ore personal goals in life. But also, refrain from slandering pastors at your leisure who merely teach what is written in the scripturs without adding personal interpretations to it.
Peace and blessings.
Tithing resp.
"It appears that you don't read very well on what we "pastors" write. Evidently, you completely missed my repeated statement wherein I do not make a demand that anyone tithes. You must have also missed the fact that my wife and I, as leaders in the church; are always the first tithers, thereby setting an example that we are not teaching anything that we do not believe in practicing"
You are one of the few exceptions that may not make a demand on the members. Remember I said "pastors" that being plural not singular. As for the statement concerning you and your wife I didn't see that point. I just read the message again. Maybe it's in a different location or you may have intended on mentioning it. Please don't be so sensitive.
Genesis 14 & Hebrews 7
Let me ask you (ALL) of what. There is no scripture atleast of what I have found that says Abraham tithe of his personal possessions. Abraham made a vow not to take spoils of war. Abraham tithed what actually belong to others and gave to another. However the Abraham and Jacob experience which were one time events before the law of tithing aren't even the focus of why tithing is no more. Whether you or any other pastor uses those 2 incidents to support tithing. One can never get around the fact that those were personal, out of custom and not of commandment from GOD. Yes you were correct. I'm not a student of ancient warfare. Was that suppose to be an insult? Ouch that hurt. What I do know is the use of Abraham's experience to justify tithing is a very poor attempt as I mentioned before. If went out in the "hood" and cracked some blood gang member across the nogging and took a wad of money out of his pocket. Would that rightfully be my possesion? According to street warfare absolutely YES. But what does that have to do with the mandate, commandments and laws from GOD. Therefore you reference concerning ancient warfare was futile concerning the law of tithing in GOD. The tithe was of the LAND.
The tithe was not income based it was of the harvest. Money was used at that time but one had to pay a penalty. Others had to travel very far so they were allowed to exchange fruit, vegies or etc for money. (If two farmers had crops of 10 carrots each, they would both be obligated to tithe one carrot. Under the agrarian tithing system it didn't matter If one sold the other 9 carrots for $5 and the other sold his remaining 9 carrots for $10. The tithe of the harvest was unrelated to the income of the harvest. Plain and simple - THE TITHE WAS NOT 10% OF INCOME, it was 10% of the harvest. The Jews under the law were NOT obligated to give 10% of their incomes! This simple fact alone is enough to destroy the false doctrine that God DEMANDS you pay 10% of your income or be cursed.) Tithing Lie.org
You mentioned Hebrews 7:11-17 I won't even bother. Has almost nothing to do with the topic.
Agriculture was the tithe. That including food animals and etc. Last I check you could eat cattle. There were exemptions or circumstances where one could give something else due condition, travel or etc as I previously mentioned. I didn't think I had to mentioned those things. Bible tells us that those who gave money faced a penalty. However it was never intended to be money primarily.
Acts 5
Wow you are really reaching. Now what does that have to do with tithing. Were does the text even mention tithing. If this were and example of tithing. Where is that example of that today? Now this is what bothers me about many of you pastors. No offense please but you take what part that will benefit the agenda. If we look at the Acts 4:34-36 work. We have many so called Apostles today. Who neither move in power like the true Apostles of old. Nor do they move by example. Many take from people but rarely if ever give. Another topic but my point is to do such a thing as sell one possessions and give to the church could be done today for fair distribution. However we won't see it because it's not required.
How does a pastor today measure what goes under the rod? We do have poor people and they didn't tithe. There is just to many holes with tithing today. Tithing today is oppresive to the poor. I quite sure God would have nothing to do with that.
Let me add also tithing undermines spirit led giving
(Your response: Totally incorrect again. If one is truly "spirit led" to give, then one would give in strict obedience to God, His word, and His perfect will. This because, the first evidence of one being "spirit led" is that he/she obeys God. Improper teaching on this has led to individuals with 6 figure salaries believing that a $3 bucket plunk ($1 for the Father, 1 for the Son, 1 for the Holy Ghost), is an acceptable, "spirit led" offering.)
How ridiculous of an example you gave. That was the total opposite of what I wrote. I said spirit led giving. A person that has a six figure that gives 3 dollars is obviously not a cheerful giving, spirit led or a lover of the work God's ministry. I wasn't referring to anything but the spirit leading not someone's fleshly heart.
(Your response)It is very intersting that you cite a web site as your source of information when that same web site has information posted by several apostates contending that the Bible is full of error an contradiction. And I, for one; am a stauch proponent of Christians doing their homework before citing web information as being "biblical truth". In addition, this is not about what we pastors can't imagine, but what congregants like yourself can't seem to fathom. That is, we live in a real world wherein nothing is coming to us for free. Yet you want to sit in a sanctuary with lights so you can see to read your bible, heat so that you are warm in the winter, a/c to cool you in the hot summer months, and a roof over your head to keep you dry when it rains. But I suppose you expect the pastors to go into bankruptcy keeping all of this up, maintained, and running for your benefit.
I haven't checked everything concerning that site's teaching. As I said years ago I found them to be one of the resourceful sites concerning no more tithing. I have dozens of them I just chose to use their site because cover the large scope of tithing. One could poke holes, put out fires or critique just about anyones site. So what's your point? I gave the site's text as a reference point.
Of course we live in a world were nothing is free. Still doesn't justify tithing or bondage. I totally believe in giving. It's in order. As far as someone wanting the amenities of a house of worship. I don't know who you were speaking for because what do you tell a guy who has church in his home. The lights, heat or a/c is going to be on whether people tithe or not. Or well it should be if one desires those things. In the beginning of the church they did the same. There weren't small, average size or oversized "churches. It's quite odd mentions cheerful giving though never mentions tithing. He does talk about other churches giving or supporting ministry though tithe isn't the term mentioned. MMMMMMMMMMM. I highly doubt a pastor going bankrupt. Especially one who lives in his means. Most of the good pastors I know actually work or own a business. The others are the one's who prey on the unlearned, spiritually deaf, dumb and blind. Most if not all those types are wealthy to extremely rich so I don't see them going bankrupt anytime soon.
{Some points already mentioned but there are others}
6. Tithing as taught today is modified and NOT the same as Biblical tithing.
God gave the tithes to the Levites as an inheritance in return for their service and to compensate them for having no personal inheritance of land. The Levites gave tithes to the Priests from the tithes they received. Christianity has no agrarian system, no Levites and every Christian is now a priest, the temple and co-workers with Christ. [2 Peter 2:5 & 9, Rev. 1:6, 5:10, 20:6] Every Jew was required by the Levitical law to pay three tithes of his property:
(1) one tithe for the Levites;
(2) one for the use of the temple and the great feasts; and
(3) one for the poor of the land. [Numbers 18, Deuteronomy 14]
Given the above, it is clear that any church mandating tithes should be spending AT LEAST ONE THIRD of their income on the poor since that is what was required under mandated law tithing. How many churches come close to this? I know of none. Yet it is not uncommon for some ministers to call their parishioners thieves if they don't tithe. It's all of the law or none of it.
The only two pre-law examples of tithing in Genesis were voluntary, non-routine and profit [ownership] based. Biblical law tithing was agrarian [land] based. Neither was income or money based as is usually taught today. People should not be "creatively constructing" doctrine, teaching that biblical tithing is giving 10% of their gross or net income, picking and choosing what part of the tithing law they will follow, mandating amounts or mixing law with Grace. The bible is clear on what pre and post law tithing was and how it was to be handled. A tithe is a tenth, but a tenth of what and how? If one wants to teach a tithe is 10% of gross or net income do NOT call it biblical tithing. It is YOUR plan for giving, NOT the biblical agrarian or pre-law plan. Since it is YOUR plan, be extra careful about putting stumbling blocks into people's path by purporting that your plan is God's law resulting in judgement if not followed.
Tithing CAN'T be practiced as it was in biblical times because the law, the agrarian system, the agricultural system, sacrifices, debt cancellation, Year of Jubilee and other interrelated factors are all abolished. Plus, today's churches have no "law" in place requiring them to fulfill the communal responsibilities and resource distribution of the agrarian law based tithing system.
Therefore, it would probably be best to do away with the word "tithing" entirely in this age of Grace to avoid the mixing of law and Grace that is common today. However, that may be difficult given the "tithemania" that has swept the land. Many will believe a "giving plan" will assist contributions and help people decide what is appropriate to give and we will discuss that shortly. Tithing lie.org
9. Christ did NOT teach giving 10% of ones income but the principle of supporting ministers and churches remains.
There was a well-established money system in place at the time of Christ. Yet, Christ's ONLY direct mention of tithing was to a JEW still under law and the tithing was HERBS [agrarian], NOT money or income from herbs. [Matthew 23:23, Luke 11:42] There was certainly a market for herbs and spices [John 12:5, Mark 14: 3-5, Matthew 26:7-9] yet the tithes mentioned by Jesus were clearly herbs, not income from herbs. So, are we to tell Christians today they must tithe herbs? Are we to make a totally unscriptural leap from herbs to 10% of income? Christ also ordered some to perform ceremonial cleansing, foot washing and Christ celebrated Jewish holy days and feasts. Why are these things not demanded of Christians today? It is ALL of the law or none of it. Even in teachings to Jews, Christ taught tithing was NOT a priority with God [Luke 18: 9-14] and that there were weightier matters that God was concerned about. [Matthew 23:23] In addition to the above, consider various translations regarding Jesus' mention of tithing and note how the meaning changes: Tithing Lie.org
Neil